It was a beautiful night in Chicago and my buddy Ben called me up and asked if I’d like to go to ‘movie in the park’ with him and his girl, Evelyn. I had nothing planned so I told him that I’d meet him there. ‘Movie in the park’ is an ongoing summer event in the city. They play old classic movies in Grant Park, a huge field where summer events in the city take place. It’s like a drive-in except you are sitting on a blanket and having a picnic while the film is presented on a giant screen at the north end of the park. I’ve been to a few of these and I always have a great time.
Ben is a friend of mine from the days I used to work at the Chicago Sun-Times. Since I left the paper in January, we have remained close. He is partly responsible for my first date with my now fiance, Jamie. I was on a dating website and was ready to swear off finding girls on the site as a result of some disastrous dates when Ben spotted Jamie’s profile. “She’s hot and it looks like a match!” He asserted. And the rest as they say is history.
I got to the park around 6:30 and caught up with Ben and Evelyn. We discussed our respective summers. The conversation flowed until about 8:30 when the sun went down and the movie started. The movie they were showing last night was Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho. I had never seen it before and wasn’t expecting it to disturb me the way it did. I can usually sit through any kind of movie without having any lasting thoughts about it. I’m able to separate what I see on film from what is going on in my life. Jamie decided not to come because scary movies tend to upset her. I should have stayed home with her.
The movie begins harmlessly with a female protagonist who steals some money and is en route to find her boyfriend and run away with him. She stops along the way at the infamous Bates Motel where climactic events ensue. Basically, what disturbed me about the film was that the antagonist, Norman Bates, is a character suffering from a spate of mental disorders and psychotic behavior. He is a cold-blooded killer and is consumed by the dueling personae of his deceased overbearing mother and his own submissive character. Hitchcock does a masterful job of pitting the combating personalities against one another, and the result is Bates’ uncontrollable urge to kill every woman that gets close to him. As the psychiatrist describes at the end of the movie, his mother-half takes over and commits brutal acts of violence unbeknown to his actual being.
We hear about violence every day in the news and I wonder how many of these individuals are plagued by untreated mental illnesses. Hitchcock does such a good job of depicting this insane man that one’s reaction is ‘I get why some people commit homicides–they can’t contend with the disturbing swirls in their psychotic minds.’ I tried to put the movie out of my head as I headed home and got into bed but the frightening image of Bates in his mother’s robe and wig charging after victims with a butcher knife took center stage. I was finally able to settle down with the realization that this was art and not real life, but as a person suffering from a mental illness myself; I couldn’t help but wonder where the edge lies and how victims get to that edge and fall off. Again I took solace in knowing that I have never harbored any violent thoughts but what is the impetus of such thoughts in people who live normal lives only to snap one day and become cold-blooded killers? Usually you hear about abuse in their pasts or a tendency to act on violent urges well before the point of murder, but then you hear about family men or women who take out their loving families in one fell psychotic swoop. I can’t help but identify disturbing art forms as possible inspirations for these horrific actions. Why is the American public so consumed by blood and guts? During some of Bates’ insane gratuitous rampages the captivated crowd applauded and urged him on like a running back who breaks through the line and is en route to a dramatic touchdown. Why are we so moved by violence? Following the movie I couldn’t figure out what was more disheartening, the gruesome acts depicted on screen or the crowd’s reactions to the acts as they played out in the film? I think I’m going to stick to feel-good movies for a while and steer clear 0f serial killers on the silver screen.